A Gendered-based Study of Discourse Markers in “Shaw’s Arms and the Man”

Keywords: discourse markers, gender, social relationship

Abstract

This study is intended to investigate the difference between males and females in terms of using discourse markers. The study hypothesizes that gender influences the frequency and type of discourse markers employed by participants, and that males use more discourse markers than females. It is also hypothesized that the differences between females and males in terms of using discourse markers are not only gendered-based, but can also be attributed to some situational and social factors. The present study follows two types of procedures: theoretical and practical. The theoretical part consists of presenting a theoretical framework of discourse markers, while the practical part consists of selecting samples from “Shaw’s Arms and the Man”, and analyzing them in the light of an eclectic model. The adopted model consists of two levels: situational, and pragmatic. The results of analyzing the selected dramatic texts show that males use more discourse markers than females. Both males and females employ discourse markers for different purposes due to the gendered features socially ascribed to them. The results also show that social relationship, social distance, social status, the mood of the speaker, the topic they talk about, type of text, its setting, and its theme, have a vital impact on the frequency and type of socially employed by males and females.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. New York: John Benjamins Publishing.

Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Al-Khawaldeh, A. (2018). Uses of the Discourse Marker Wallahi in Jordanian Spoken Arabic: A Pragma-Discourse Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(6), 114-123. doi: 10.30845/ijhss.v8n6p1

Al-khazraji, A. (2019). Analysis of Discourse Markers in Essays Writing in ESL Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 559-572. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12235a

Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (Vol. 2). London: Longman.

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions (Vol. 19). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Brinton, L. J. (2017). The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a Marker of Situation. In H. Giles & K. Scherer (Eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 33-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cable, S. (2017). The Expression of Modality in Tlingit: A Paucity of Grammatical Devices. International Journal of American Linguistics, 83(4), 619–678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/692975

Coates, J. (1987). Epistemic Modality and Spoken Discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society, 85(1), 110-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1987.tb00714.x

Coates, J. (2013). ‘So I Mean I Probably…’: Hedges and Hedging in Women’s Talk. In C. Jennifer (Ed.), Women, Men and Everyday Talk (pp. 31-49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Erman, B. (1992). Female and Male Usage of Pragmatic Expressions in Same-sex and Mixed-sex Interaction. Language Variation and Change, 4(2), 217-234.

Fareh, S., Jarad, N., & Yagi, S. (2020). How Well Can Arab EFL Learners Adequately Use Discourse Markers. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(2), 85-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.2.4

Fishman, P. M. (1997). Interaction: The Work Women Do. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Modern Linguistics Series (pp. 416-429). London: Macmillan Education.

Furkó, P. B. (2020). Discourse Markers and Beyond: Springer International Publishing.

Grzech, K. (2021). Using Discourse Markers to Negotiate Epistemic Stance: A View from Situated Language Use. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 208-223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.003

Hacquard, V., & Cournane, A. (2016). Themes and Variations in the Expression of Modality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of NELS.

Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H. (2021). On the Rise of Discourse Markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Holmes, J. (1984). 'Women's language': A Functional Approach. General Linguistics, 24(3), 149.

Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2017). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.

Huang, L. F. (2019). A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage. Language and Speech, 62(3), 570-593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918798863

Irfan, F., Shahzadi, M., Talib, N., & Awan, T. H. (2020). A Comparative Corpus Based Analysis of Discourse Markers for Gender Description in the Alchemist and Pride and Prejudice. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(11), 358-376.

Laaboudi, D. (2022). Discourse Marking and Gender Correlation in the Jebli Speech Community. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 8, 112-129. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/IJAL/article/view/34224

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman's Place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-79.

Latif, F., & Tahir Rasheed, M. (2020). An Analysis of Gender Differences in the use of Metadiscourse Markers in Pakistani Academic Research Articles. Science International, 32(2), 187-192.

Lenard, D. B. (2016). Gender Differences in the Personal Pronouns Usage on the Corpus of Congressional Speeches. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 3(2), 161-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.30111

Lutzky, U. (2012). Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Meilan, J. J., Martinez-Sanchez, F., Carro, J., Carcavilla, N., & Ivanova, O. (2018). Voice Markers of Lexical Access in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 15(2), 111-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666170829112439

Moscati, V., Zhan, L., & Zhou, P. (2017). Children's on-line Processing of Epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language, 44(5), 1025-1040. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000313

Muhyidin, A. (2020). Does the Writing Exposition Text Ability Correlate to Reading Habit and Discourse Markers Mastery? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 885-895. doi: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.682065

Müller, S. (2005). Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse (Vol. 138). New York: John Benjamins Publishing.

Nashruddin, N., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2021). Linguistics Politeness in Reinforcing Character During Learning Activities. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 210-217.

Pasaribu, T. A. (2017). Male and Female Students’ Use of Textual Discourse Markers in Writing Academic Essays. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1), 74-81.

Pourdana, N., Nour, P., & Yousefi, F. (2021). Investigating Metalinguistic Written Corrective Feedback Focused on EFL Learners’ Discourse Markers Accuracy in Mobile-mediated Context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(7), 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00111-8

Rhee, S. (2020). On Determinants of Discourse Marker Functions: Grammaticalization and Discourse-analytic Perspectives. Linguistic Research, 37(2), 289-325. doi: 10.17250/khisli.37.2.202006.005

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers (5 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schourup, L. C. (2016). Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. London: Routledge.

Tavakoli, M., & Karimnia, A. (2017). Dominant and Gender-specific Tendencies in the Use of Discourse Markers: Insights from EFL Learners. World, 7(2), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v7n2p1

Trihartanti, R. (2020). Gender Differences in the Use of Hedging Devices in Students’ Conversations. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan, 6(2), 103-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2303

Trihartanti, R., & Fadilah, M. Y. (2022). 'Oh,''Well,'and Hedges as Negative Politeness Strategy: The Different Use of Discourse Markers in Female and Male Students' Utterances. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(1), 37-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i1.4184

Winkler, E. G. (2008). A Gender-based Analysis of Discourse Markers in Limonese Creole. Linguistic Exploration of Gender & Sexuality, 53-71.

Wooten, S. C. (2017). Revealing a Hidden Curriculum of Black Women’s Erasure in Sexual Violence Prevention Policy. Gender and Education, 29(3), 405-417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1225012

Published
2023-07-31
How to Cite
Azeez, A. I., Mahmoud, A. H., & Nouri, A. A. (2023). A Gendered-based Study of Discourse Markers in “Shaw’s Arms and the Man”. JELITA, 4(2), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v4i2.144