The Influence of Differentiated Instruction on Senior High School’s English Learning Outcomes
Abstract
The goal of this research is to use differentiated instruction in English in order to improve student learning outcomes. This class X research was carried out at UPT SMA Negeri 3 Takalar. This study employs structured interviewing methods, recording, and observation in a qualitative descriptive research design. According to the research, 20 students, or 13 students in total, had a completeness score in cycle I mathematics learning of 65%, and 7 students, or 35% of the students, did not achieve the passing requirement. Then, in cycle II, the comprehensiveness of the instruction yields an 81.50% acquisition in English for a total of 17 pupils, as well as children who have met the score.
Downloads
References
Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., &Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-Analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69– 83.
Granås, K. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in the English Subject. A qualitative study of teachers’ approaches to differentiated instruction and the factors that affect their ability to differentiate (Master's thesis, UiT Norges arktiske universitet).
Giudici, F., Castelletti, A., Giuliani, M., & Maier, H. R. (2020). An active learning approach for identifying the smallest subset of informative scenarios for robust planning under deep uncertainty. Environmental modelling & software, 127, 104681.
Hilton, M. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
Johnsen, S. (2003). Adapting instruction with heterogeneous groups. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 5-6.
Joseph, S. (2013). Strategies for enhancing student learning experiences in higher education. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 3(2).
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 805.
Leite, E. A. M., Lencastre, J. A., Silva, B. D., & Borges Neto, H. (2020). Learning style in a virtual environment: a study with elementary school teachers at in-service training.
Purba, M., Purnamasari, N., Soetantyo, S., Suwarma, I. R., & Susanti, E. I. (2021). Prinsip Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi (Differentiated Instruction) pada Kurikulum Fleksibel sebagai Wujud Merdeka Belajar. Pusat Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen
Samuels, S. J., & Farstrup, A. E. (1992). What research has to say about reading instruction. International Reading Association, 800 Barksdale Rd., PO Box 8139, Newark, DE 19714-8139 (Book No. 495; $11.00 members, $16.00 nonmembers).
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational psychology review, 24, 569-608.
Tileston, D. W. (2006). Teaching strategies for active learning: Five essentials for your teaching plan. Corwin Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated instruction. In Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 279-292). Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2023). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599-628). Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2024 M Jufrianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.